Revenue Ruling 74-607

1974–2 C.B. 149 (1974)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Revenue Ruling 74-607

Internal Revenue Service
1974–2 C.B. 149 (1974)

Facts

A corporation involved in construction financing (the taxpayer) made mortgage construction and development loans to borrowers for 18-to-36-month terms. Each loan was repaid in a single payment when a construction project was completed and the borrower obtained permanent financing. The taxpayer made money from interest charged on the loan amounts. Because construction loans were high risk, the taxpayer also charged borrowers points, with each point representing 1 percent of a loan’s face value. A borrower would pay the points to prevent the taxpayer from charging a higher interest rate on the loan. In most instances, the taxpayer withheld the total points amount from the loan funds disbursed to the borrower when the loan was made. Occasionally, the taxpayer disbursed the full loan amount and then later received payment of the points amount from the borrower. The Internal Revenue Service issued a revenue ruling to clarify at what time the taxpayer, which used an accrual method of accounting, should include points amounts in its gross income.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership