Revenue Ruling 83-106

1983–2 C.B. 77 (1983)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Revenue Ruling 83-106

Internal Revenue Service
1983–2 C.B. 77 (1983)

Facts

A taxpayer owned and operated a licensed gambling casino. The taxpayer used the accrual method of accounting for both financial and tax-reporting purposes. As part of its operations, the casino extended credit to customers who met certain creditworthiness standards. In exchange, the customer provided the casino with a promissory note, commonly referred to as a marker, as evidence of his or her indebtedness. The marker specified the amount of credit extended. Customers generally used the credit to gamble at the casino’s tables and could apply any remaining chips or cash to their outstanding balance once they finished gambling. If a customer could not immediately repay the debt, the casino either held the marker until a promised repayment date or initiated collection efforts. Although gambling debts were generally unenforceable under state law, more than 95 percent of the casino’s customers repaid their debts. For federal tax purposes, the taxpayer reported revenue from credit transactions in the tax year the debts were actually collected. The Internal Revenue Service issued a revenue ruling to clarify when the taxpayer was required to recognize income from customers who gambled on credit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership