Revenue Ruling 83-106
Internal Revenue Service
1983–2 C.B. 77 (1983)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
A taxpayer owned and operated a licensed gambling casino. The taxpayer used the accrual method of accounting for both financial and tax-reporting purposes. As part of its operations, the casino extended credit to customers who met certain creditworthiness standards. In exchange, the customer provided the casino with a promissory note, commonly referred to as a marker, as evidence of his or her indebtedness. The marker specified the amount of credit extended. Customers generally used the credit to gamble at the casino’s tables and could apply any remaining chips or cash to their outstanding balance once they finished gambling. If a customer could not immediately repay the debt, the casino either held the marker until a promised repayment date or initiated collection efforts. Although gambling debts were generally unenforceable under state law, more than 95 percent of the casino’s customers repaid their debts. For federal tax purposes, the taxpayer reported revenue from credit transactions in the tax year the debts were actually collected. The Internal Revenue Service issued a revenue ruling to clarify when the taxpayer was required to recognize income from customers who gambled on credit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

