Rewe-Zentral Aktiengesellschaft v. Bundesmonopolverwaltung fur Branntwein (Cassis de Dijon Case)

Case 120/78, 1979 E.C.R. 649

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rewe-Zentral Aktiengesellschaft v. Bundesmonopolverwaltung fur Branntwein (Cassis de Dijon Case)

Court of Justice of the European Union
Case 120/78, 1979 E.C.R. 649

Facts

Cassis de Dijon was a liqueur produced in France with an alcohol content below 25 percent. The importer of the liqueur, Rewe-Zentral (Rewe) (plaintiff) was prohibited from selling it in Germany (defendant), because German law required all liqueurs to contain at least 25 percent alcohol. Rewe challenged Germany’s law on the theory that it violated Article 28 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which prohibits member countries of the European Union from restricting the free movement of goods. The German court referred the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union to decide whether the German minimum-alcohol-content law violated Article 28. Germany argued that the law protected public health, because it was easier to gain a tolerance to alcohol from drinks with less alcohol. Germany also argued that the law protected consumers, because it created a minimum standard consumers expected in liqueur products.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership