Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Reynolds v. Commissioner

T.C. Memo. 1999-62 (1999)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...

Reynolds v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo. 1999-62 (1999)

Facts

Violet Reynolds (plaintiff) was in a long-term nonmarital relationship with Gregg P. Kent. Kent worked to provide for the couple, and Reynolds took care of their house, acted as hostess when they entertained guests, and cared for Kent when he was sick. Over the course of the 25-year relationship, Kent bought a house and boat for the couple, gave Reynolds a car, and provided Reynolds with a weekly allowance for personal and household use. In 1991 the couple broke up, and Kent filed a lawsuit against Reynolds to get Reynolds to move out of their house and return the car that Kent gave her. Eventually, Kent and Reynolds settled the lawsuit. As part of the settlement, Kent agreed to pay Reynolds approximately $60,000, provide Reynolds with monthly maintenance payments for five years, and transferred title to the car, clothing, jewelry, and household furniture to Reynolds. In 1994 Kent paid $22,000 to Reynolds. Reynolds did not report the money as income on her annual income-tax return because she viewed the money as a gift. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) determined that Reynolds should have included the settlement payments in her gross income. The Commissioner reasoned that the payments were essentially compensation that Kent gave to Reynolds in exchange for Reynolds’s past services that she provided to him by taking care of their household. Reynolds petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Laro, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership