Rheinberg-Kellerei GmbH v. Vineyard Wine Company
North Carolina Court of Appeals
53 N.C. App. 560, 281 S.E.2d 425 (1981)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Rheinberg-Kellerei GmbH (Rheinberg) (plaintiff), a West German corporation, entered into a contract to sell wine to Vineyard Wine Company (Vineyard) (defendant), a North Carolina corporation. Vineyard did not request that the wine be delivered to any specific location and was unaware of the details of the shipment. Rheinberg delivered the wine to a shipping line without notifying Vineyard, and the wine was placed on a ship for transit from the Netherlands to North Carolina. The ship was lost at sea, along with all hands and cargo. Rheinberg sent Vineyard’s bank an invoice for the wine on December 27, 1978. Vineyard did not learn that the shipment had been lost until January 1979. Upon learning that the shipment was lost, Vineyard refused to pay for the shipment, and Rheinberg sued to recover the cost of the shipment. The trial court found that Rheinberg had failed to comply with Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 2-504 by failing to promptly notify Vineyard of the shipment and that the risk of loss of the wine therefore did not pass from Rheinberg to Vineyard upon delivery of the wine to the ship carrier under UCC § 2-509. The trial court dismissed Rheinberg’s action. Both parties appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wells, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.