Rhodes v. J.P. Sauer & Sohn, Inc., Sig Arms, Inc.

98 F. Supp. 2d 746 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rhodes v. J.P. Sauer & Sohn, Inc., Sig Arms, Inc.

United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
98 F. Supp. 2d 746 (2000)

Facts

Charles Rhodes, Jr., and Judy Rhodes (plaintiffs) sued German corporation J.P. Sauer and Sohn, Inc. (Sauer) and Sauer’s U.S. subsidiary, Sig Arms, Inc. (Sig) (defendants) under the Louisiana Products Liability Act for injuries Charles sustained when a gun manufactured by Sauer and Sig malfunctioned. After filing their lawsuit, the Rhodeses attempted to serve process on Sauer by mailing a copy of the petition, which was written in English only, to Sauer’s office in Germany via private courier. Sauer moved to dismiss the lawsuit for insufficient service of process, arguing that the Rhodeses attempt of service did not comply with the provisions of the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (Hague Convention), which required translation of documents into German and that a request for service be made to the designated German central authority before process could be properly served. The Rhodeses conceded that the documents were untranslated and that service was not obtained through the German central authority, but the Rhodeses argued that service was still properly made because Sauer’s U.S.-based subsidiary, Sig, was properly served, thereby bestowing the court with jurisdiction over Sauer as well, pursuant to Louisiana statutes permitting service of process on a foreign parent corporation via its domestic subsidiary.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Little, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership