Rice v. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
22 Vet. App. 447 (2009)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Sterling Rice (plaintiff) served in the United States Army from 1976 to 1973, including service in the Vietnam War. In 1998, Rice filed for Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) (defendant) benefits for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). After initially denying his claim, the VA eventually awarded Rice a service-connected disability for PTSD rated at 30 percent. Rice filed his disagreement regarding this rating and also raised a claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU). In 2002, the VA increased the rating for his PTSD to 70 percent, effective back to 1998, and granted him TDIU benefits, effective back to 2000. Rice appealed to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board), seeking an earlier effective date for the TDIU benefits. The board denied an earlier effective date, holding that Rice’s claim for TDIU was in fact a new claim for an increased rating, not a claim for a higher initial rating for his PTSD award. Rice appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.