Nebraska Supreme Court
61 N.W.2d 350 (1953)
In 1900, Oscar Knutson owned the northeast quarter of a tract of land. A.L. Hannah purchased the northwest quarter. Hannah obtained oral permission from Knutson to lay tile across Knutson’s land to drain a small pocket of Hannah’s land. In 1901, Hannah laid tile across 160–250 feet of Knutson’s land. Norman A. Ricenbaw (plaintiff) came to own Hannah’s land and Emil Kraus (defendant) came to own Knutson’s land. In 1952, Kraus plugged the flow of water onto his land. Ricenbaw sued Kraus. The trial court held that Ricenbaw had an easement over Kraus’ land, and had the right to enter Kraus’ land to maintain the easement. The trial court also enjoined Kraus from interfering with the tile drain or interfering with Ricenbaw’s maintenance of the tile drain.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wenke, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.