Richards v. Maiden

54 Va. Cir. 337 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Richards v. Maiden

Virginia Circuit Court
54 Va. Cir. 337 (2000)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Josephine Lantz executed a will prior to her death. The will contained a residuary clause, which gifted the residue of her estate to all her grandchildren. The residual estate was to be held in trust and to be used for the educational benefit of all her grandchildren. Lantz died and was survived by four adult children and three infant grandchildren. The executor (plaintiff) filed a complaint, seeking that the court construe the trust to benefit only the grandchildren living at the time of Lantz’s death, not future grandchildren. The guardian ad litem who represented any unknown or unborn grandchildren asserted that any interests in the trust fund were executory interests that had not yet vested at the time of Lantz’s death, so such interests were invalid because they violated the rule against perpetuities.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Doherty, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership