Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Richards v. Wisconsin

United States Supreme Court
520 U.S. 385 (1997)



The police obtained a search warrant to search Richards’s (defendant) hotel room for drugs. When the police went to the hotel to execute the warrant, they hid their true identity, with one officer identifying himself as the maintenance man. However, when Richards cracked the door open with the chain still on, he could tell it was the police so the police resorted to kicking down the door to gain entry. Once inside, they found cash, cocaine, and Richards as he was trying to escape out a window. On account of the police failing to knock and announce their presence, Richards moved to have the evidence found in the hotel suppressed. The trial court denied the motion. The state supreme court affirmed the decision and held that when executing a search warrant in a felony drug case, the police need never knock and announce their presence because such investigations frequently involve dangerous situations and the possibility that evidence can quickly and easily be destroyed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 499,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 499,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial