Richardson v. Chapman

676 N.E.2d 621 (Ill. 1997)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
R
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Richardson v. Chapman

Illinois Supreme Court
676 N.E.2d 621 (Ill. 1997)

SC
Play video

Facts

Keva Richardson and Ann McGregor (plaintiffs) were in a car stopped at a traffic light when a semi-trailer driven by Chapman (defendant) negligently crashed into them. As a result of the crash, Richardson could no longer use her legs, she had limited function in her arms, she suffered from pain in her legs and shoulders, her chest and abdomen were paralyzed, she had significant facial injuries, she had no control over her bladder or bowel functions, and she contracted restrictive pulmonary disease. Richardson’s economist, Professor Linke, testified that Richardson’s future medical expenses had a maximum of $9,570,034. McGregor on the other hand suffered only a laceration on her forehead that left a small scar. The jury awarded Richardson $22,358,814, including $11,000,000 for future medical expenses, and McGregor $102,215. McGregor’s award was comprised mainly of $100,000 for pain and suffering. The appellate court rejected Chapman’s challenge to the amount of damages. Chapman appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (McMorrow, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 780,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms