United States Supreme Court
481 U.S. 200 (1987)
Marsh, Williams, and Martin (defendants) were suspected of assault and murder. Over Marsh’s objection, Marsh and Williams were tried jointly for the crimes. Marsh testified that she was innocent. Williams did not testify, but Williams’ earlier confession to police was redacted to delete all mention of Marsh and admitted into evidence. The jury was repeatedly instructed not to hold Williams’ confession against Marsh. Nevertheless, the confession did implicate Marsh when connected with other evidence at trial. Marsh was convicted of murder, robbery, and assault. Marsh filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that the admission of Williams’ confession violated her Sixth Amendment rights. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on this issue.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.