Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 19,800+ case briefs...

Richardson v. Township of Brady

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
218 F.3d 508 (2000)


Robert T. Richardson (plaintiff) is the owner of 194 acres of land in the Township of Brady (Township) (defendant). The Township has in place a local zoning ordinance, enacted in 1987, that limits the number of units of livestock on property based on the animals’ odor-producing qualities. In January 1997, Richardson sought to establish a nursery-swine facility on his property, on which he would raise young swine under 55 pounds. Under the terms of the ordinance, swine was defined as having a unit of measure of 1.00, regardless of its size. Based on this definition, Richardson was limited to raising 1,999 pigs. However, Richardson believed his operation would need to raise at least 4,200 pigs to remain economically viable. He therefore sought to obtain an interpretation or variance from the Township Zoning Board of Appeals redefining the unit of measure for swine under 55 pounds to .50. The township supervisor accordingly proposed amendments for the animal-unit definition of swine. However, this amendment failed before the Brady Township Planning Commission. On February 16, 1998, Richardson requested that the Zoning Board of Appeals provide an interpretation in regards to the animal-unit definition of nursery swine. The attorney for the Township Board responded, stating that the Zoning Board of Appeals lacked the jurisdiction to amend the text of the ordinance. Richardson filed suit in the Circuit Court for the County of Kalamazoo, arguing that the ordinance violated his substantive and procedural due process rights. The case was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Township and dismissed Richardson’s claims.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

Concurrence (Ryan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 510,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 510,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 19,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial