Richardson v. Tricom Pictures & Productions, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
334 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (2004)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
In June 2001, Marinell Richardson (plaintiff) was terminated from Tricom Pictures & Productions Inc. (Tricom) (defendant). Richardson sued Tricom in federal district court for violating multiple state and federal laws by creating a hostile work environment and not compensating employees appropriately. Richard also claimed that she had been wrongfully discharged in retaliation for making complaints. While the trial was pending, Richard found substantially equivalent employment with WLRN, Inc. Richardson’s position entitled her to an annual salary of $32,000, which was $2,000 higher than her salary at Tricom. However, Richardson was terminated from WLRN after only three months for failing to cooperate with and respect other employees. Richardson then found substantially equivalent employment with Barton G. Thus (Barton). Richardson’s position at Barton entitled her to a $32,000 salary. However, Richardson was terminated from Barton for unknown reasons. In 2003, Richardson’s complaint against Tricom was tried. The jury found for Tricom on the majority of Richardson’s claims. However, the jury did find that Tricom had wrongfully discharged Richardson in retaliation for her complaints. The jury also determined that Richardson was entitled to backpay under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The jury advised a payment of $20,000. Richardson moved to increase the recommended amount. Tricom moved to reduce the recommended amount. The court considered the motions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Altonaga, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.