Richardson v. Tricom Pictures & Productions, Inc.

334 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (2004)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Richardson v. Tricom Pictures & Productions, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
334 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (2004)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In June 2001, Marinell Richardson (plaintiff) was terminated from Tricom Pictures & Productions Inc. (Tricom) (defendant). Richardson sued Tricom in federal district court for violating multiple state and federal laws by creating a hostile work environment and not compensating employees appropriately. Richard also claimed that she had been wrongfully discharged in retaliation for making complaints. While the trial was pending, Richard found substantially equivalent employment with WLRN, Inc. Richardson’s position entitled her to an annual salary of $32,000, which was $2,000 higher than her salary at Tricom. However, Richardson was terminated from WLRN after only three months for failing to cooperate with and respect other employees. Richardson then found substantially equivalent employment with Barton G. Thus (Barton). Richardson’s position at Barton entitled her to a $32,000 salary. However, Richardson was terminated from Barton for unknown reasons. In 2003, Richardson’s complaint against Tricom was tried. The jury found for Tricom on the majority of Richardson’s claims. However, the jury did find that Tricom had wrongfully discharged Richardson in retaliation for her complaints. The jury also determined that Richardson was entitled to backpay under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The jury advised a payment of $20,000. Richardson moved to increase the recommended amount. Tricom moved to reduce the recommended amount. The court considered the motions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Altonaga, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership