Richelle L. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco

2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 225 (2003)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Richelle L. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal
2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 225 (2003)

Facts

Richelle L. (plaintiff) was a parishioner at a Roman Catholic church where Reverend FN (priest) (defendant) was a priest. Richelle was a deeply religious woman who had remained chaste until the priest initiated a sexual relationship with her. The priest, who claimed that he had also remained chaste, convinced Richelle to have sex with him in the church rectory, assuring her that doing so would not be improper. The priest called Richelle daily, leaving romantic messages on her answering machine, and told Richelle that he planned to stay in the area after he retired so that he could be near her. In reality, the priest had seduced a number of parishioners at several churches. Richelle sued the priest, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and deceit, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The priest filed a demurrer, arguing that Richelle’s lawsuit was barred by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution because the suit would force the court to evaluate the way the priest had carried out his ecclesiastical duties, excessively entangling the court in the religious beliefs and practices of the church. The trial court sustained the demurrer, and Richelle appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kline, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership