Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Ricketts v. Adamson

United States Supreme Court
483 U.S. 1 (1987)


Adamson (defendant) was charged with first-degree murder in the car bombing of Donald Bolles. Adamson entered into a plea agreement to plead guilty to second-degree murder in exchange for his agreement to testify against Max Dunlap and James Robinson. Adamson agreed to testify against anyone involved in the murder upon request. The agreement stated that if Adamson refused or lied, the original charge of first-degree murder would be reinstated. Adamson testified, Dunlap and Robinson were convicted, and Adamson was sentenced pursuant to the agreement. Later, Dunlap and Robinson’s convictions were reversed, and the prosecution asked Adamson to testify at the new trial. Adamson refused on the grounds that the duty to testify ended at sentencing. After Adamson pled the Fifth at a pretrial hearing, the prosecution filed new first-degree murder charges. Adamson moved to quash on the basis of double jeopardy. The court denied the motion. Adamson then offered to testify, but the state refused. Adamson was found guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ordered the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus on double jeopardy grounds.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Brennan, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.