Ricketts v. City of Hartford

74 F.3d 1397 (1996)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ricketts v. City of Hartford

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
74 F.3d 1397 (1996)

Facts

Weldon L. Ricketts (plaintiff) sued the City of Hartford (defendant) for violations of his constitutional rights. Ricketts, a Black man, was coaching a soccer team in a park when numerous, nearly all White, police officers came by chasing Timothy Moore, a Black man suspected of assault and attempted robbery. The police-officer testimony and Ricketts’s testimony diverged after this, but Ricketts testified that the police officers were beating Moore when they caught him and that when Ricketts questioned them, they beat Ricketts too. To corroborate his testimony, Ricketts sought to admit a tape recording of the events in which a man stated, “Run him over.” Ricketts claimed that a police officer named Davis, who Ricketts said was his principal aggressor, said this. The court held a hearing to determine the admissibility of the tape. During the hearing, Davis denied making the statement or even hearing it. The court found the tape inadmissible, holding that Ricketts failed to properly authenticate the tape. After the court dismissed Ricketts’s complaint, Ricketts appealed, arguing that the court erred in finding the tape inadmissible.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mahoney, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 741,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership