Ricks v. Budge
Supreme Court of Utah
64 P.2d 208 (1937)
Ricks (plaintiff) had an infected right hand and sought immediate medical treatment from physician partners, Drs. S.M. Budge and D.C. Budge (defendants). At the physicians’ office, Ricks was examined by S.M. Budge and told that his hand was getting worse. D.C. Budge also examined the hand and indicated that it needed to be opened. Ricks was instructed to go immediately to the hospital. At the hospital, S.M. Budge went to Ricks’ room and refused to provide further medical treatment to his hand until he paid for previous, unrelated treatment rendered by the Budges. Ricks left the hospital and was examined by another physician who believed his condition to be dire. He immediately operated, but Ricks’ finger had to subsequently be amputated. The trial court found in favor of the Budges and Rick appealed the ruling.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hanson, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Folland, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.