Riddell, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
754 F.3d 1375 (2014)
- Written by Gonzalo Rodriguez, JD
Facts
Riddell, Inc. (plaintiff) imported football jerseys and pants. These items were meant to be worn together with protective pads and included certain characteristics, such as internal pockets meant to house the protective pads. However, the imported items did not include pads. United States Customs Service (customs) (defendant) categorized the jerseys and pants as articles of apparel under Chapters 61 and 62 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), subjecting the items to import duties of 14.9 percent to 32 percent. Riddell challenged the classification, arguing that the products should have been categorized as football equipment under subheading 9506.99.20 of the HTSUS, which was duty-free. The United States Court of International Trade upheld customs’ classification, stating that although the jerseys and pants would have been football equipment if they included protective pads, the mere inclusion of pockets and other features to hold the pads was not enough to transform the items from apparel to football equipment. Riddell appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Taranto, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.