Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Ridder v. City of Springfield

109 F. 3d 288 (1997)
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Ridder v. City of Springfield

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
109 F. 3d 288 (1997)

Facts

Ridder (plaintiff) filed suit against the City of Springfield (defendant) and various county and city officials in connection with his arrest for rape and related charges. After protracted litigation resulting in summary judgment for Springfield on all counts, Springfield filed motions for sanctions and attorney’s fees pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927, respectively. Springfield acknowledged that it failed to satisfy the requisite safe-harbor period in Rule 11, arguing it would have been an “empty formality” given Ridder’s vigorous defense even after it became clear that there was no factual or legal basis for his suit against Springfield. The magistrate judge agreed, denying Ridder’s motion to stay the decision pending an appeal of the case and granting Springfield’s motion for sanctions and attorney’s fees. Ridder appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 18,800 briefs - keyed to 985 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Top-notch customer support.