Ridgeview Construction Co., Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Co. of Chicago
Illinois Appellate Court
628 N.E.2d 1060 (1993)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago (American) (defendant) purchased property in trust for Michael Wellek. Wellek contracted with WWI Corporation to build a warehouse on the property. The contract contained a no-lien clause waiving the right of WWI or its subcontractors to assert mechanic’s liens against the property. WWI then subcontracted the warehouse construction to Ridgeview Construction Company and other subcontractors (plaintiffs). These subcontracts explicitly incorporated all provisions of the general contract. Wellek subsequently mortgaged the property to Heller Financial Services, Inc. (Heller) (defendant). When WWI failed to pay its subcontractors for their work, the subcontractors sued Heller and American to foreclose on the subcontractors’ mechanic’s liens. The trial court entered summary judgment for the subcontractors. The court ruled the no-lien contracts invalid both on public-policy grounds and because the contracts evidenced fraudulent collusion between Wellek and WWI. The Illinois Appellate Court reversed, ruling that Heller and American were innocent purchasers with no knowledge or reason to know of fraudulent dealings between Wellek and WWI. On remand, the trial court rejected the subcontractors’ proffer of evidence to rebut the appellate court’s innocent-purchaser ruling. The court entered summary judgment for Heller and American. The subcontractors then appealed to the appellate court. The subcontractors also lobbied the Illinois legislature for legislation banning no-lien contracts.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tully, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.