Ridgeview Construction Co., Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Co. of Chicago

628 N.E.2d 1060 (1993)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ridgeview Construction Co., Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Co. of Chicago

Illinois Appellate Court
628 N.E.2d 1060 (1993)

RW

Facts

American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago (American) (defendant) purchased property in trust for Michael Wellek. Wellek contracted with WWI Corporation to build a warehouse on the property. The contract contained a no-lien clause waiving the right of WWI or its subcontractors to assert mechanic’s liens against the property. WWI then subcontracted the warehouse construction to Ridgeview Construction Company and other subcontractors (plaintiffs). These subcontracts explicitly incorporated all provisions of the general contract. Wellek subsequently mortgaged the property to Heller Financial Services, Inc. (Heller) (defendant). When WWI failed to pay its subcontractors for their work, the subcontractors sued Heller and American to foreclose on the subcontractors’ mechanic’s liens. The trial court entered summary judgment for the subcontractors. The court ruled the no-lien contracts invalid both on public-policy grounds and because the contracts evidenced fraudulent collusion between Wellek and WWI. The Illinois Appellate Court reversed, ruling that Heller and American were innocent purchasers with no knowledge or reason to know of fraudulent dealings between Wellek and WWI. On remand, the trial court rejected the subcontractors’ proffer of evidence to rebut the appellate court’s innocent-purchaser ruling. The court entered summary judgment for Heller and American. The subcontractors then appealed to the appellate court. The subcontractors also lobbied the Illinois legislature for legislation banning no-lien contracts.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tully, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 783,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership