Riley v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
913 F.Supp. 879 (1995)
- Written by Brian Meadors, JD
Facts
Lynda Riley (plaintiff) was a nurse. While removing an Angiocath intravenous catheter needle made by Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc. (Beckton) (defendant), the patient moved suddenly, and Riley accidentally stuck herself. The needle infected Riley with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Riley sued, contending that the Angiocath needle was defective because it was unreasonably dangerous. Riley argued that there was an available and feasible alternative with a needle that would be withdrawn into a protective sheath. With the Angiocath, accidental HIV infections are about 3.5 per 500 million uses. Using an alternative would lower that rate to one infection per 500 million uses. The alternative would be 10–36 percent more expensive. Furthermore, the alternative would require additional training and does not work as well as the Angiocath. Beckton moved for summary judgment, arguing that the Angiocath is not unreasonably dangerous.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Troutman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
