Riley v. Riley
Utah Court of Appeals
138 P.3d 84 (2006)
- Written by Brittany Frankel, JD
Facts
Ms. Riley (defendant) and Mr. Riley (plaintiff) were married from February 1992 until the spring of 2003. Ms. Riley contributed approximately $275,000 to $300,000 more to the marriage over the years than Mr. Riley did. Mr. Riley committed adultery, which is willing sexual relations between a person who is married and someone other than that person’s spouse. In fact, Mr. Riley fathered a child out of wedlock with a woman in Texas. Ms. Riley became aware of the adultery over one year after the child was born. Ms. Riley demanded that Mr. Riley cut off all contact with the child and its mother. In spring 2003, Mr. Riley left the marriage. Mr. Riley agreed to pay Ms. Riley $900 per month until their home in Utah sold. The trial court analyzed the couple’s expenses and determined that Ms. Riley’s expenses totaled $338 more than her income per month. The trial court also analyzed testimony regarding whether Mr. Riley had fathered a second child out of wedlock around the time that he and Ms. Riley separated. The trial court found that Mr. Riley was not a credible witness. The trial court considered the issue of fault, which is a ground for divorce under which one spouse commits a wrongful act against the other, such as adultery, abandonment, or prison confinement. The trial court determined that, but for the adulterous acts of Mr. Riley, the divorce would not have occurred. Mr. Riley was ordered to pay Ms. Riley $900 per month for 156 months, which was equal to the length of the marriage. Mr. Riley appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Billings, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.