Riley v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
60 P.3d 204 (2002)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Richard Riley (defendant) and Edward Portalla fired gunshots into a crowd of people at a bonfire. They seriously wounded two of the people. Both Riley and Portalla were charged with two counts of first-degree assault, a crime that requires one to recklessly cause a serious physical injury to another through the use of a dangerous weapon. At trial, the State was unable to determine which of the defendants’ weapons wounded the two victims. The jurors were instructed that they could find Riley guilty as charged if they either found Riley was the principal who fired the wounding shot or if he was an accomplice who aided and abetted Portalla. Riley was found guilty as an accomplice on both assault charges. Riley argues on appeal that the jury instructions on accomplice liability were flawed because it failed to require evidence that Riley aided and abetted with the intention of having Portalla inflict serious physical injury.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mannheimer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
