Riley v. United States

486 F.3d 1030 (2007)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
R
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Riley v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
486 F.3d 1030 (2007)

DM
Play video

Facts

In February 2002, Lucas Riley (plaintiff) was in the process of turning from a local road onto U.S. Highway 63 in Missouri. Visibility of Highway 63 was compromised by mailboxes. Believing the road to be clear, Riley pulled onto the highway. His vehicle was broadsided by a truck, resulting in serious injuries. Riley sued the United States (defendant) on the ground that the United States Postal Service (USPS) had negligently placed the mailboxes. Residents in the area had complained about the location of the mailboxes in the past, but the USPS declined to move them on account of cost. After Riley’s accident, the USPS agreed to relocate the mailboxes. In its defense to Riley’s suit, the United States offered evidence that the USPS had decided to locate the mailboxes curbside for purposes of efficiency and safety given that many homes were set far back from the roadway. A federal district court dismissed Riley’s complaint on the basis of sovereign immunity. Riley appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Benton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 779,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms