Rilley v. MoneyMutual LLC

884 N.W.2d 321 (2016)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rilley v. MoneyMutual LLC

Minnesota Supreme Court
884 N.W.2d 321 (2016)

SC
Play video

Facts

Scott Rilley (plaintiff) was a Minnesota resident who used MoneyMutual LLC’s (defendant) website to obtain a payday short-term loan. After an online registration and application process, which included Rilley’s home address, MoneyMutual began sending Rilley emails, including an initial email matching Rilley with a Minnesota lender. In addition, MoneyMutual used Google AdWords to display advertisements for its company when a Google user searched for phrases such as “payday loans Minnesota.” Rilley filed a class action suit in Minnesota state court, alleging that the loans MoneyMutual provided in Minnesota were illegal. MoneyMutual moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Rilley presented evidence that MoneyMutual sent emails to more than 1,000 Minnesota residents. The trial court denied the motion. MoneyMutual appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 735,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership