Rinaldi v. Iomega Corporation
Delaware Superior Court
41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 1143 (1999)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Iomega Corporation (Iomega) (defendant), a Delaware corporation, manufactured zip drives. Six people who bought Iomega’s zip drives (plaintiffs) brought a class action against Iomega, alleging the drives were defective and claiming, among other things, that Iomega breached the implied warranty of merchantability. Iomega included a disclaimer of the implied warranty of merchantability inside each of the zip drives’ packaging. The plaintiffs argued that the disclaimer was not conspicuous, as required under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 2-316(2), because the disclaimer could not be discovered by a buyer until after the drive was purchased and the packaging was opened. Iomega moved to dismiss the claim, based on its disclaimer of the implied warranty of merchantability.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cooch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.