From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Ring v. Arizona
United States Supreme Court
536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002)
The State of Arizona (plaintiff) prosecuted Timothy Ring (defendant) for murder, a crime for which the penalty was either life imprisonment or death. The jury convicted Ring. Arizona's sentencing statute provided that a death penalty could be imposed only if the trial judge found aggravating factors in the case. The judge found such factors and sentenced Ring to death. Ring appealed, and the Arizona Supreme Court affirmed Ring's death sentence. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider whether two relevant Sixth Amendment cases, Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 (1990), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), were compatible. Walton held that, so long as the jury was the factfinder as to the defendant's guilt, the judge could be the factfinder as to aggravating-sentencing factors. Apprendi held that a jury must be the factfinder if the aggravating factors increase the defendant's penalty beyond the sentencing range for his underlying offense. Arizona argued that: (1) Apprendi did not control Ring's case because the death penalty was within the sentencing range for murder, and Walton permitted the judge to determine the existence of aggravating factors; (2) Arizona's sentencing law was a permissible way for the state to comply with Eighth Amendment requirements; and (3) it is fairer and more efficient for judges than juries to determine the existence of aggravating factors.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)
Dissent (O'Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.