Rippy v. Board of School Trustees

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7427 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rippy v. Board of School Trustees

United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7427 (2000)

Facts

Christopher Marlor (plaintiff) was one of two students at Mooresville High School (school) who tended to wear all black clothing. A student at the school approached another student at lunch and made death threats. The threatened student reported the incident to the assistant principal, Bruce Peters. When the threatened student told Peters that he did not know the threatening student, Peters had the threatened student look through the previous year’s yearbook. The student identified Marlor’s picture as that of the student who threatened him. Since the picture had been taken, Marlor had grown facial hair. The same day, a second student was threatened by a student whom the second student did not know. Peters offered the second student the same yearbook, and the second student also identified Marlor based on the old picture. The school issued a short suspension against Marlor and scheduled an expulsion hearing. At the expulsion hearing, the two threatened students submitted written statements saying that Marlor had threatened them. Marlor and his attorney requested the identities of the students but were denied. The hearing examiner recommended Marlor for expulsion, and the Mooresville Board of School Trustees (board) (defendant) affirmed the decision. Marlor sued in state court, claiming deprivation of procedural due process. The case was removed to federal court. The board filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership