Rite Aid Corp. v. Lake Shore Investors
Maryland Court of Appeals
471 A.2d 735 (1984)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Lake Shore Investors (Lake Shore) (plaintiff) entered into a real estate purchase agreement with BTR Realty, Inc. (BTR), whereby BTR was to purchase property from Lake Shore for a set price. During the sale process, Rite Aid Corporation and Rite Aid of Maryland (collectively Rite Aid) (defendant) claimed that it owned a portion of the property that was included in the purchase agreement between Lake Shore and BTR. Because of Rite Aid’s claim BTR insisted that a clause in the purchase agreement be included that required Lake Shore to secure a written release from Rite Aid. When Rite Aid refused to sign the release, BTR withdrew from the agreement. Lake Shore filed suit against Rite Aid for false and fraudulent claim of lease and wrongful interference with a contract. At trial, the judge ruled that damages had to be measured under the contractual “benefit of the bargain” rule which was defined to be the difference between the fair market value of the property at the time of the interference and the contractual price for the purchase of the property. At the conclusion of Lake Shore’s case at trial, the judge granted Rite Aid’s motion for a directed verdict on both issues. Lake Shore appealed and the court of special appeals reversed and remanded the case for a new trial. The Maryland Court of Appeals granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Orth, Jr., J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.