Supreme Court of Nevada
216 P.3d 213 (Nev. 2009)
Mr. Rivero (defendant) and Ms. Rivero (plaintiff) were married and had a child, but got divorced. The Riveros reached a divorce settlement, including a custody agreement under which they agreed to joint physical custody of their child. The agreement stated that Ms. Rivero would have physical custody of the child five days per week and Mr. Rivero would have physical custody two days per week. Less than two months after the district court entered a divorce decree incorporating the agreement, Ms. Rivero filed a petition for primary physical custody. The district court held that the parties had intended with their agreement an even timeshare and that the divorce decree was inconsistent with that intent, because it decreed a five-days-to-two-days split. As a result, the district court modified the divorce decree to a 50/50 timeshare. Ms. Rivero appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gibbons, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.