Rivkin v. Postal

2001 WL 1077952 (2001)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rivkin v. Postal

Tennessee Court of Appeals
2001 WL 1077952 (2001)

Play video

Facts

David Rivkin (plaintiff) and Lori Postal (defendant) began an extramarital affair in 1994. Rivkin was married at the time; Postal was single. In 1995, Postal gave birth to the couple’s child. Rivkin bought an expensive house for Postal and their child to live in. Rivkin conveyed the house by quitclaim deed to Postal and himself as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. He also paid for horses for Postal, a nanny for the child, and a ring that Postal ordered for herself after Rivkin refused. Postal and Rivkin did not make wedding plans, but Postal told her parents that they would wed after Rivkin divorced his wife. Rivkin did not contradict her, nor did he prevent her from wearing the ring in front of her family. In March 1997, Rivkin’s divorce became final. In June 1997, he broke up with Postal. That September he filed a lawsuit against her for the partition of their jointly owned property and to recover certain personal property. Postal filed a counterclaim alleging breach of the promise to marry. The trial court decision was appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Koch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership