RLM Communications, Inc. v. Tuschen
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
831 F.3d 190 (2016)
Amy Tuschen (defendant) worked for RLM Communications, Inc. (RLM) (plaintiff), a company that provided cyber security and related needs to government agencies. At the time she was hired, Tuschen entered into a confidentiality agreement with RLM. Tuschen also signed a covenant not to compete or noncompete agreement with RLM. The noncompete agreement said that, for one year after leaving RLM, Tuschen could not directly or indirectly participate in any business similar to a business that RLM engaged in then or later. After six years at RLM, Tuschen went to work for eScience and Technology Solutions, Inc. (eScience) (defendant), a smaller company that directly competed with RLM for government contracts relating to information technology. Before leaving RLM, Tuschen copied several files from her company laptop onto a CD. Soon after starting at eScience, Tuschen helped eScience bid against RLM on a government contract. RLM sued Tuschen and eScience in state court for, among other things, breach of the noncompete agreement, breach of the confidentiality agreement, and misappropriation of trade secrets. RLM sought preliminary and permanent injunctions against Tuschen and eScience. The state court granted a temporary restraining order, but then the defendants removed the case to federal court. The federal district court also granted RLM a temporary restraining order. However, the federal district court ultimately granted summary judgment to the defendants and dismissed RLM’s claims. RLM appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Diaz, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.