Circuit Court of New Jersey, Morris County
20 A.2d 707 (N.J. Cir. Ct. 1941)
Clyde Robb (plaintiff) brought a negligence suit on behalf of his decedent against John C. Hickey, Inc. (Hickey) (defendant). Hickey argued that Robb’s decedent was contributorily negligent. The trial judge instructed the jury that if the decedent was contributorily negligent, the degrees of each party’s negligence did not matter. The jury’s verdict, which was read in the absence of the judge, stated: “The jury finds that there was negligence on the part of both parties involved—The evidence shown is that the defendant was more negligent than the plaintiff—We therefore recommend an award of $2,000.00 to the plaintiff . . . .” Robb sought to set aside the verdict because it was ambiguous, inconsistent, and contrary to the jury instructions. Hickey filed a motion to mould the verdict into a verdict in favor Hickey.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Leyden, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 238,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.