Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Robbins v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas
785 P.2d 1010 (Kan. 1990)


Facts

Edward Robbins (plaintiff) was the lessor under an oil and gas lease to which Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (Chevron) (defendant) acquired the rights by 1985. In 1960, Chevron’s predecessor in interest, Gulf Oil Corporation (Gulf), had drilled producing wells and signed a 20-year gas-purchase contract with Kansas Gas Supply Corporation (KGS). In 1978, Gulf agreed to extend the term of the contract for 10 years in exchange for an increased sales price. In 1982, the price for the gas as determined under the contract was higher than the price permitted by the Kansas Natural Gas Price Protection Act (Act). Gulf and KGS agreed that the Act capped the price at which Gulf could sell the gas, notwithstanding the purchase contract. In 1985, the demand for gas decreased. KGS attempted to renegotiate the contract with Chevron for a lower price, but Chevron refused. KGS refused to continue paying for gas under the contract. As there was no alternative purchaser available, Chevron shut in the wells and began paying shut-in royalties to Robbins. In 1987, Chevron reopened the wells and began selling gas again. Robbins brought suit against Chevron to cancel the gas lease. Robbins alleged that Gulf and Chevron had breached the implied covenant to market by executing the 10-year extension of the contract with KGS and by failing to make sales while the wells were shut in. The trial court granted Robbins’s motion for summary judgment, cancelled the lease, and awarded Robbins damages for gas sold after the wells were reopened in 1987. Chevron appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (McFarland, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.