Robbins v. Whelan

653 F.2d 47 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Robbins v. Whelan

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
653 F.2d 47 (1981)

SC

Facts

Robert Whelan (defendant) ran into a car in which Larry Robbins (plaintiff) was a passenger. Robbins’s car was pulling onto the highway from a rest area. Robbins sued Whelan, claiming that Whelan’s speed caused the accident. At trial, Whelan claimed that he was not speeding. A state trooper testified that he observed 160 feet of skid marks leading to the scene of the accident. Robbins attempted to introduce a Department of Transportation National Highway Safety Bureau report (the report) into evidence. The report had performance metrics for Whelan’s type of car, including braking time at certain speeds. Robbins sought to introduce the report in combination with the state trooper’s testimony to show that, given Whelan’s braking time, Whelan must have been speeding. Robbins, however, did not make that purpose as clear as it could have been for the trial judge. Whelan objected to the report on the ground that it was not relevant. The district court sustained the objection. The jury found in Whelan’s favor. Robbins appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Coffin, C.J.)

Dissent (Campbell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership