Robertson v. Cartinhour

2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126030 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Robertson v. Cartinhour

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126030 (2011)

Facts

Wade Robertson (plaintiff) and William Cartinhour (defendant) formed a partnership for the purpose of bringing securities class action lawsuits. Both invested substantial amounts of money into the venture. Robertson was in charge of bringing the suits. Cartinhour executed an indemnity agreement giving Robertson certain rights. After Robertson failed to succeed with an appropriate suit despite investing considerable sums of the partnership’s money, Cartinhour demanded that his investment be returned and threatened to sue. Robertson responded by filing an action for breach of the indemnity agreement against Cartinhour in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.C. Court). Robertson’s suit also named as defendants other attorneys alleged to have cooperated with Cartinhour and certain Serbian individuals. Cartinhour counterclaimed. The matter went to trial and the jury issued a verdict in favor of Cartinhour. At some point after the filing of the D.C. action, Robertson filed a second suit against Cartinhour and some of the same defendants from the D.C. matter (defendants) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The New York suit arose from the same events as the D.C. suit but it alleged fraud, defamation, tortious interference with contract, and other claims. The New York defendants moved to transfer the matter to the D.C. Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Swain, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership