Robinette v. Commissioner of the IRS

439 F.3d 455 (2006)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

Robinette v. Commissioner of the IRS

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

439 F.3d 455 (2006)

Facts

James Robinette (plaintiff) did not file income-tax returns for several years and, as a result, owed over $1 million in back taxes, penalties, and interest. Eventually, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) placed Robinette into default and notified Robinette of its intention to impose a levy on his property. Section 6330 of the Internal Revenue Code required the IRS to give a taxpayer a collection due-process hearing before imposing a levy on the taxpayer’s property. In accordance with § 6330, the IRS conducted a collection due-process hearing for Robinette. The IRS appeals officer in charge of the hearing examined Robinette’s file, gathered relevant documents, and wrote an explanatory memorandum recommending that the levy be imposed on Robinette’s property. The IRS Office of Appeals approved the levy. Robinette appealed to the United States Tax Court under § 6330(d)(1), arguing that the appeals officer abused his discretion in deciding to impose the levy. The tax court conducted a de novo hearing at which it entered new evidence and decided in favor of Robinette. The IRS appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Colloton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership