Robinson v. Diamond Housing Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
463 F.2d 853 (1972)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
In 1968, Mrs. Robinson (defendant) entered into a month-to-month lease with Diamond Housing Corporation (Diamond) (plaintiff) for a residence in Washington, D.C. Mrs. Robinson entered into the lease with the understanding that Diamond would repair several defects on the property, including an unsafe porch, unsafe railings, and a ceiling that did not connect with the wall in her bedroom. These defects were in violation of several housing codes. Diamond failed to make the necessary repairs, and as a result, Mrs. Robinson ceased her rent payments. Diamond then brought an action to evict her. Mrs. Robinson argued that the lease was invalid due to the housing code violations. A jury ruled in her favor. Diamond then brought a subsequent action to evict Mrs. Robinson based on the thirty days’ notice to vacate it provided her. Mrs. Robinson argued that this was a retaliatory eviction for Diamond’s failure to prevail on the previous action. The trial court ruled in favor of Diamond. Mrs. Robinson appealed to the United State Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Skelly Wright, J.)
Dissent (Robb, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.