Robinson v. Diamond Housing Corporation

463 F.2d 853 (1972)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Robinson v. Diamond Housing Corporation

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
463 F.2d 853 (1972)

Play video

Facts

In 1968, Mrs. Robinson (defendant) entered into a month-to-month lease with Diamond Housing Corporation (Diamond) (plaintiff) for a residence in Washington, D.C. Mrs. Robinson entered into the lease with the understanding that Diamond would repair several defects on the property, including an unsafe porch, unsafe railings, and a ceiling that did not connect with the wall in her bedroom. These defects were in violation of several housing codes. Diamond failed to make the necessary repairs, and as a result, Mrs. Robinson ceased her rent payments. Diamond then brought an action to evict her. Mrs. Robinson argued that the lease was invalid due to the housing code violations. A jury ruled in her favor. Diamond then brought a subsequent action to evict Mrs. Robinson based on the thirty days’ notice to vacate it provided her. Mrs. Robinson argued that this was a retaliatory eviction for Diamond’s failure to prevail on the previous action. The trial court ruled in favor of Diamond. Mrs. Robinson appealed to the United State Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Skelly Wright, J.)

Dissent (Robb, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership