From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...
Robinson v. Lindsay
Supreme Court of Washington
598 P.2d 392 (1979)
Billy Anderson (defendant), age 13, was driving a snowmobile owned by the Lindsay family (defendants) and pulling Kelly Robinson (plaintiff), age 11, on an attached inner tube. The snowmobile crashed, resulting in Robinson losing the full use of one of her thumbs. Robinson brought suit for negligence. The trial court instructed the jury that it was Anderson’s duty to use the same standard of care that a reasonably careful child of his age, intelligence, maturity, training, and experience would use in the same or a similar situation. The jury found in Anderson's favor, but Robinson excepted to the jury instruction. Robinson claimed that an adult standard of care should have been used. Based on this, the trial court ordered a new trial. Anderson appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Utter, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.