Robinson v. Lindsay
Supreme Court of Washington
598 P.2d 392 (Wash. 1979)
Billy Anderson (defendant), a 13 year old, was driving a snowmobile with Kelly Robinson (plaintiff), age 11, being pulled on an attached tube. The snowmobile crashed, resulting in Robinson losing the full use of one of her thumbs. Robinson brought suit for negligence. The trial court instructed the jury that it was the Anderson’s duty to use the same standard of care that children his age and of his intelligence would use. The jury found in favor of Anderson, but Robinson excepted to the jury instruction, claiming that an adult standard of care should have been used. Based on this, the trial court ordered a new trial. Anderson appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Utter, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.