Robinson v. Robinson

100 Ill. App. 3d 437 (1981)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Robinson v. Robinson

Appellate Court of the Second District of Illinois
100 Ill. App. 3d 437 (1981)

JL

Facts

Ann Robinson (plaintiff) sued Wylie Robinson (defendant) for divorce and his parents Earl and Alice Robinson (defendants) to establish her rights in certain property. Earl and Alice owned real property upon which Ann and Wylie had built, improved, and maintained a house. There was no written agreement between the two couples regarding a transfer of title to the property. After Ann and Wylie experienced marital difficulties and began divorce proceedings, Ann alleged that Earl and Alice would be unjustly enriched if they retained the property without paying Ann restitution. Wylie himself disclaimed any interest in the property. The trial judge concluded in Ann’s favor and granted her half the value of the improvements, minus the value of the land, after making a provision for the payment of a loan from Earl and Alice. The trial judge further attached a lien to the property for child support and other payments owed to Ann by Wylie. Earl and Alice appealed, arguing that unjust enrichment was not applicable because they had not asked Ann and Wylie to improve the property.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Unverzagt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership