Robinson v. Trousdale County
Tennessee Supreme Court
516 S.W.2d 626 (1974)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Mr. Robinson and Mrs. Robinson (plaintiffs) owned land in Trousdale County, Tennessee, as tenants by the entirety. The county (defendant) wanted to acquire the land in order to widen a public highway. Mr. Robinson unilaterally executed a deed that conveyed the land to the county. Later, Mr. and Mrs. Robinson sued the county for damages for taking the land. The county alleged that neither of the Robinsons had any right to damages because Mr. Robinson had conveyed the land by deed to the county. The lower court held that Mr. Robinson was estopped from claiming any damages because of his conveyance to the county but awarded Mrs. Robinson $530 for her interest in the land. The Robinsons and the county appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision but modified the disposition of Mrs. Robinson’s award. The court directed the clerk of the court to hold the $530 and invest it for so long as both Mr. and Mrs. Robinson were alive, after which, if Mrs. Robinson died first, the money would be returned to the county. But if Mrs. Robinson survived her husband, the money would be finally distributed to her. Both the Robinsons and the county petitioned the state supreme court for certiorari. The supreme court granted certiorari only in regards to the disposition of Mrs. Robinson’s damages award.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Henry, J.)
Concurrence (Henry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.