Rocheux Int'l of N.J. v. U.S. Merchants Fin. Group

741 F.Supp.2d 651 (2010)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rocheux Int'l of N.J. v. U.S. Merchants Fin. Group

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
741 F.Supp.2d 651 (2010)

Play video

Facts

U.S. Merchants Financial Group (Merchants) (defendant) ordered large amounts of raw plastics from Rocheux International of New Jersey (Rocheux) (plaintiff), a plastics distributor, in 2005 and 2006. Although Rocheux delivered most of the plastics ordered, Merchants failed to pay for the goods delivered in 2006. Additionally, Merchants directed Rocheux to deliver some of the plastics to a warehouse, which Merchants also failed to pay for. On September 6, 2006, Merchants’ president sent an email to Rochuex’s president claiming that the delivered goods substantially failed to conform with the contract descriptions. Rocheux’s president asked Merchants to provide full details of how the products were defective. After receiving no response, Rocheux’s president sent an email to Merchants’ president requesting payment for the goods delivered as well as the warehouse payment. Rocheux indicated that if payment was not made on the delinquent amounts it would sell the goods at the warehouse and seek any resulting deficiency from Merchants. Rocheux eventually sold the warehouse plastics to third parties which resulted in a deficiency of nearly $400,000. Rocheux brought suit against Merchants for breach of contract and other claims and sought to recover the amounts owed. Merchants filed a counter suit. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The district court heard the parties’ motions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brown, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 747,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership