Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc. v. Gentile Productions
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
134 F.3d 749 (1998)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
In 1988 the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Foundation built the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum (collectively, the museum) (plaintiffs) in Cleveland, Ohio. The distinctive museum building was designed by architect I. M. Pei. In 1996 photographer Charles Gentile (defendant) began selling posters featuring a photograph of the museum through his production company, Gentile Productions (defendant). The museum filed a lawsuit in federal district court against Gentile, claiming that Gentile had infringed its trademark over the building design. The museum reasoned that through Gentile’s use of the photograph of the museum building, consumers would be led to believe that the posters were produced by the museum. To support its claims, the museum highlighted the fact that it had sold merchandise featuring photographs and drawings of the museum building, including posters, since 1993. That merchandise utilized a variety of photographs and drawings that highlighted different features and angles of the building’s design. The district court found that the public connected the museum to the building design, giving the museum a trademark over the building design, and preliminarily enjoined Gentile from selling his posters. Gentile appealed, arguing that the museum had not used photographs of its building consistently enough to create a distinct commercial identity.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.