Rockford Life Insurance Co. v. Illinois Department of Revenue

482 U.S. 182, 107 S. Ct. 2312, 96 L. Ed. 2d 152 (1987)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rockford Life Insurance Co. v. Illinois Department of Revenue

United States Supreme Court
482 U.S. 182, 107 S. Ct. 2312, 96 L. Ed. 2d 152 (1987)

  • Written by Brett Stavin, JD

Facts

Private financial institutions issued securities titled Mortgage-Backed Certificate Guaranteed by Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), commonly known as Ginnie Maes. Under these certificates, the financial institutions were required to make timely payments of principal and interest. Payment was guaranteed by GNMA, which pledged the full faith and credit of the United States. GNMA was a wholly owned government corporation within the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Through guaranteeing payment of the certificates and thereby minimizing risk, GNMA became able to draw private investors into the mortgage market. Without GNMA’s guarantee, there would have been far less liquidity in the market for mortgage securities. Although GNMA provided the guarantee for payment, the primary obligation to actually make those payments fell on the issuers of the certificates. The issuers each possessed a pool of federally guaranteed mortgages. This pool of individual mortgages provided a stream of payments that the issuer utilized to pay principal and interest under the GNMA certificates. The mortgages also served as security for the obligations due under the certificates. GNMA itself was paid a fee by the issuer to cover the cost of regulatory duties. No federal funds were used in connection with the GNMA certificates unless the issuer defaulted, in which case GNMA had to guarantee the payment. In some GNMA certificates, the issuer had to make payment to the holders even if an individual mortgage within the pool of mortgages went into default. In these situations, the issuer could pursue recourse against the individual mortgagor but could not pursue any recourse against GNMA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership