Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
35 F.2d 301 (1929)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
On January 7, 1924, the board of commissioners of Rockingham County (the county) (defendant) hired Luten Bridge Co. (Luten) (plaintiff) to construct a bridge. Three commissioners voted to go forward with the bridge project, and two opposed. After the contract was formed, one of the commissioners voting in favor of the bridge project resigned and was replaced by a new commissioner who opposed the bridge project. On February 21, 1924, the commissioners passed a resolution holding that the bridge contract was not enforceable and informed Luten that the county would not honor the contract. The county directed Luten not to proceed with building the bridge and stated that any further work completed by Luten would be done at the company’s own risk and expense. At the time Luten was informed that the county would not proceed, it had performed approximately $1,900 worth of work on the bridge. Luten continued construction and finished the bridge project. Luten then brought suit against the county for the contract price. The trial court held for Luten, and the county appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Parker, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
