Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
35 F.2d 301 (1929)

Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.

Facts

On January 7, 1924, the board of commissioners of Rockingham County (the County) (defendant) hired Luten Bridge Co. (Luten) (plaintiff) to construct a bridge. Three commissioners voted to go forward with the bridge project, and two opposed. After the contract was formed, one of the commissioners voting in favor of the bridge project resigned, and was replaced by a new commissioner who opposed the bridge project. On February 21, 1924, the commissioners passed a resolution holding that the bridge contract was not enforceable, and informed Luten that the County would not honor the contract. The County directed Luten to not proceed with building the bridge, and stated that any further work completed by Luten would be done at the company’s own risk and expense. At the time Luten was informed that the County would not proceed, it had performed approximately $1,900 worth of work on the bridge. However, Luten continued construction and finished the bridge project. Luten then brought suit against the County for the contract price. The trial court held for Luten, and the County appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parker, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.