Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of California
124 Cal. Rptr. 143 (1975)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Rodgers (plaintiff) was an employee of the general contractor for a construction job. Kemper Construction Company (Kemper) (defendant) was a subcontractor on the same job. Herd and O’Brien (defendants) were employees of Kemper. Herd and O’Brien had finished their shift, but remained on the worksite working on O’Brien’s personal truck. Herd and O’Brien were drinking beer from a cooler in the employees’ locker room, which Kemper frequently allowed. Kemper would often call on employees remaining in the locker room after a shift for overtime jobs when extra help was needed. Rodgers was on his shift operating a bulldozer when Herd and O’Brien asked Rodgers for a ride across the jobsite. Rodgers declined. Tempers flared, and Herd and O’Brien beat Rodgers, causing him serious injury. Rodgers brought suit against Herd, O’Brien, and Kemper. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Rodgers against Kemper. Kemper appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tamura, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.