Rodgers v. Reimann

361 P.2d 101 (1961)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rodgers v. Reimann

Oregon Supreme Court
361 P.2d 101 (1961)

Facts

Dr. and Mrs. Lebold and Mr. and Mrs. Willett were neighbors who owned adjoining lots on Kingwood Drive in Salem, Oregon. The Lebolds and the Willetts also jointly owned the lot directly across the street from the Lebolds’ lot, Lot 11. The Lebolds sold their solely owned lot to Mr. and Mrs. Rodgers (plaintiff) in 1957. In 1959, the Lebolds and the Willetts sold their jointly owned Lot 11 to Mr. and Mrs. Reimann (defendants). The contract for the sale of Lot 11 included a covenant that restricted the maximum height at which the floor level of any house constructed on the lot could be built. The Reimanns began building a house on the lot. The Reimanns’ neighbors across the street, the Rodgers, sued the Reimanns to enforce the building restriction included in the Lot 11 sale contract. The lower court dismissed the Rodgers’ complaint, and the Rodgers appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership