Rodríguez-Álvarez v. Municipality of Juana Díaz

2017 WL 666052 (2017)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rodríguez-Álvarez v. Municipality of Juana Díaz

United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
2017 WL 666052 (2017)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Madeline Rodríguez-Álvarez (plaintiff) worked for a department of the Municipality of Juana Díaz (municipality) (defendant) and was diagnosed with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Rodríguez-Álvarez informed her supervisor of her condition, and the municipality closed the department’s bathroom and kitchen. With the department facilities closed, Rodríguez-Álvarez had to walk five to 10 minutes to access a bathroom, sometimes forcing Rodríguez-Álvarez to urinate in a hallway for relief. The municipality also changed Rodríguez-Álvarez’s work, relieved Rodríguez-Álvarez of her duties, and assigned her to sit at a desk with nothing to do. Municipality officers also stopped inviting Rodríguez-Álvarez to social gatherings. Rodríguez-Álvarez resigned from work and filed suit against the municipality for discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The municipality moved for summary judgment, arguing that Rodríguez-Álvarez’s HIV status was not a disability under the ADA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Young, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership