Rodriguez v. Zavala
Washington Supreme Court
398 P.3d 1071 (2017)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
Esmeralda Rodriguez (plaintiff) and Luis Zavala (defendant) had one son together, L.Z. Because of Zavala’s abuse, Rodriguez ended the relationship and obtained a restraining order against Zavala. Zavala violated the order by entering Rodriguez’s home, attempting to strangle her, and threatening to kill L.Z. and Rodriguez’s three daughters from a prior relationship. Rodriguez’s daughters witnessed the attack and contacted the police. Zavala was arrested. L.Z. slept through the incident. After the incident, Rodriguez petitioned for a domestic-violence protective order to protect herself and the children. The trial court issued a temporary order and held a hearing to determine whether a more permanent protective order was warranted. At the hearing, Rodriguez described Zavala’s abuse and the strangulation incident. Rodriguez also explained that she feared for the children’s safety. The trial court issued a domestic-violence protective order for Rodriguez, as the petitioner, and for her daughters, who had witnessed the incident. The trial court excluded L.Z. from the protective order on the ground that he had not witnessed the attack and had no threat to his own safety. Rodriguez appealed. The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision, holding that a petitioner could not obtain a domestic-violence protective order for another individual on the ground that the petitioner had a fear of imminent harm to the other individual. The matter was appealed to the Washington Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gonzalez, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.